If I think of anything that may help you, or happen across an ISIS model of the BCM2835, I'll post back an updateįor the uninitiated, here is a screenshot of Proteus ISIS, to which the OP was referring (I think): In short, no simulation is better than the actual, physical item - that just does not add up. Maybe you might consider making a virtual Pi on QEMU, if you want the software emulation, but based upon your opening post, it would seem you require a simulation of the hardware, in which case I can only recommend the ACTUAL hardware, especially considering how cheap it is, offset against how much time and potential for frustration you could be setting yourself up for by attempting to emulate the Pi in Proteus ISIS. I am sure you could build a virtual Pi inside that, so long as you're able to find a pre-configured BCM2835 SoC model, but I can't imagine that there is one available it's just too much of an obscure, niche part to be implemented in widely available application circuits, mainly due to the fact that Broadcom are extremelysecretive of the silicon inside it.

I don't understand how someone might think thatĭo you mean Labcenter's Proteus ISIS? Amazing software - have used it lots. There is no way that simulating hardware is better than the actual, physical hardware itself. Is it possible? If yes,How? If no, then is there any other simulationg software for the same to test the codes and prevent the potential bugging in actual hardware?

It is better to test the programming and configurations using stimulation software like Proteus and then go for actual implementation.Īnd so I want to use Raspberry Pi circuit board in Proteus.

Librerias para proteus 8 professional